Iks
Name: chauhan pragati sureshbhai
Subject:IKS
Class assignment
Vakrokti Theory
Introduction
Kuntaka was a great Sanskrit literary theorist and the originator of the Vakrokti school of poetics. He lived after Anandavardhana (9th century) and before Abhinavagupta (10th century), during the peak period of Indian poetics. His contemporaries were Dhananjaya and Rajashekhara.
Kuntaka’s major work is Vakrokti-Jivita, where he explained his unique theory of poetry. According to Ganesh Devy, Vakrokti is similar to Western Formalism and New Criticism, because it focuses on language and style as the essence of poetry.
Kuntaka and Vakrokti-Jivita
Kuntaka’s book Vakrokti-Jivita was discovered and published in 1922 by Sushil Kumar Dey. The manuscript is incomplete, consisting of four chapters (though some believe there was a fifth).
Scholars assume that Kuntaka was from Kashmir, and he lived between 1000–1030 CE. Mahimbhatta mentions Kuntaka in his writings, proving that Kuntaka came before him. His book contains both Karika (verses) and Vritti (commentary).
History of Vakrokti
- The concept of Vakrokti existed before Kuntaka but was not systematic.
- Bhamaha considered Vakrokti as the soul of poetry and included it as a shabdalankara (figure of sound).
- Vamana treated it as artha-alamkara (a figure of meaning, mainly metaphor).
Kuntaka gave Vakrokti a scientific form and made it the distinguishing mark of poetry, different from ordinary language. Thus, he placed it at the centre of poetics.
What is Vakrokti?
Hence, Vakrokti means a special, creative, and unique mode of expression different from common speech.
For Kuntaka, poetry is not just words (shabda) and meaning (artha), but their combination must carry vakrata (artistic twist/uniqueness). This quality gives life to poetry, hence the title of his work Vakrokti-Jivita (Vakrokti is the “life of poetry”).
Vakrokti is born out of:
- Vaidagdhya (intelligence of the poet)
- Kavi-Koushala (poetic skill/craftsmanship)
Kuntaka’s Vakrokti
Kuntaka argued that Swabhavokti (simple natural expression) cannot create beauty in poetry. What makes poetry special is Vakrokti, the artistic twist
He classified Vakrokti into six types:
- Phonetic figurativeness (Varnavinyasa Vakrata) – play of sounds.
- Lexical figurativeness (Padapurvardha Vakrata) – special choice of words.
- Grammatical figurativeness (Pratyaya Vakrata) – use of grammar creatively.
- Sentential figurativeness (Vakya Vakrata) – beauty in sentence structure.
- Contextual figurativeness (Prakarana Vakrata) – charm through context.
- Compositional figurativeness (Prabandha Vakrata) – total structure of a poem.
Kuntaka’s Idea of Sahitya
Kuntaka defined Sahitya (literature) as the union of word and meaning.
- Both word and meaning must remain united but not lose their own identity.
- Their harmony creates spiritual beauty, which is literature.
- Hence, Kuntaka argued that Alamkara (ornament) is not essential; the union itself is enough to produce beauty.
Kuntaka discussed different styles (margas):
Sukumara Marga – soft, delicate style.
- Vichitra Marga – ornate, complex style.
- Ubhayatmaka Marga – combination of both.
- He also explained Gunas (qualities of poetry):
He illustrated these with references to Kalidasa.
Conclusion
Kuntaka was a brilliant critic after Bhartrihari, who contributed greatly to language and literary theory.
- He saw poetry as deviation from ordinary speech (vakrata).
- He explained how beauty is created in poetry through style and creativity of the poet.
- His six-fold classification of Vakrokti became a method of literary criticism.
- He balanced both the poet’s creativity and the reader’s response, making him a modern thinker of aesthetics.
Thus, Kuntaka’s Vakrokti Theory remains a milestone in Indian literary criticism and shows poetry as a unique artistic expression, not just ordinary language.
Home assignment
Vakrokti, an Indian aesthetic principle of indirect and figurative expression, can be seen as a lens through which to analyze film adaptations, particularly those that involve significant rewriting or intertextual play. Applying vakrokti helps in examining how adaptations engage in "rewriting a source text through various forms of oblique expression, moving beyond simple imitation to create new meanings and aesthetic experiences within the new medium of film.
Vakrokti as an Aesthetic Concept
Indirect Expression:
Derived from the Sanskrit words "vakra" (curved, indirect) and 'ukti" (speec vakrokti describes language that deviates from the literal and straightforwar to create aesthetic depth and emotional resonance.
Figurative Language:
It emphasizes the use of metaphor, symbolism, and other figurative devices enrich meaning and engage the listener or reader on a deeper, connotative level
The Soul of Poetry:
Vakrokti is considered the vital essence of poetic art, differentiating it from ordinary, denotative language and transforming it into a vessel for artistic a emotional depth.
Vakrokti and Film Adaptation
A Framework for Analysis:
The principles of vakrokti can be used to analyze how a film adaptation reworks a literary source through its own unique medium.
Rewriting and Intertextuality:
Film adaptations, rather than being direct transcriptions, often involve a fe of "rewriting" where the original work is reinterpreted. Vakrokti provides a framework for understanding how this "oblique" expression manifests in adaptation, similar to how it does in poetry.
Examples:
- Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are Dead: This adaptation of Shakespeare's Hamlet is an example of using vakrokti by re-envisioning a well-known narrative from a new, oblique p thereby creating a new artistic product through the lend interxtuality.
Mahesh Dattani's Plays:
Indian playwright Mahesh Dattani's work,rooted in the Indian context, is analyzed through Indian aesthetic models like vakrokti, where the goal is to achieve the ultimate end of aesthetic delight (rasa) through indirect means.
In essence, applying vakrokti to film adaptation allows for an examination of how the screenwriter/director uses the visual and auditory tools of cinema to express the source material indirectly, creating a unique and enriched aesthetic experience that resonates with the audience on a deeper level.
Eassy
Vakrokti Theory
Kuntaka is one of the most significant literary theorists in Sanskrit poetics and is considered the founder of the Vakrokti School. He lived between the ninth and tenth centuries, after Anandavardhana and before Abhinavagupta, at a time when Indian literary criticism had reached its highest level of refinement. His major work is Vakrokti-Jivita, a text in which he presented his original theory of poetry. The title itself, meaning “Vakrokti is the life of poetry,” indicates the centrality of this concept in his thought. For Kuntaka, poetry is not merely a union of word (shabda) and meaning (artha), but it must carry a special quality of expression, which he termed Vakrokti. This unique artistic expression distinguishes poetic language from ordinary communication.
The idea of Vakrokti was not entirely new. Earlier critics had mentioned it, though in limited ways. Bhamaha called Vakrokti the soul of poetry and treated it as a shabdalankara, while Dandin accepted it alongside Swabhavokti as one of the figures of speech. Rudrata reduced it to a mere play of words, and Vamana considered it an artha-alamkara, a form of metaphor. It was Kuntaka who gave the concept a systematic and scientific foundation, elevating it from a minor ornament to the very essence of poetry. Thus, while his predecessors saw Vakrokti as one figure among many, Kuntaka saw it as the fundamental principle that makes poetry what it is.
The term Vakrokti is made of two words: vakra, meaning crooked, indirect, or special, and ukti, meaning expression. Together, Vakrokti refers to a special, imaginative, and artistic mode of speech. Unlike ordinary language, which communicates facts directly, poetic language conveys ideas indirectly and beautifully. For Kuntaka, the interweaving of word and meaning alone is not enough; it must be accompanied by vakrata or artistic twist. This is what gives life to poetry and delights the reader. Poetry, therefore, is a matter of both vaidagdhya (poetic intelligence) and kavi-kaushala (artistic skill).
Kuntaka classified Vakrokti into six levels, showing how it operates at every stage of composition. These are: phonetic figurativeness (varna-vinyasa vakrata), where beauty arises from sound patterns; lexical figurativeness (pada-purvardha vakrata), based on special choice of words; grammatical figurativeness (pratyaya vakrata), created through innovative use of grammatical forms; sentential figurativeness (vakya vakrata), where sentence structure adds charm; contextual figurativeness (prakarana vakrata), where meaning depends on context; and compositional figurativeness (prabandha vakrata), which covers the artistry of the entire poem. This six-fold classification shows that Vakrokti is not confined to ornamentation but works from the smallest unit of sound to the largest unit of a whole literary composition.
In his Vakrokti-Jivita, Kuntaka also explained the nature of Sahitya or literature. He defined it as the harmonious union of word and meaning. Both should exist together without losing their individuality, and their combination should produce spiritual and aesthetic beauty. For this reason, Kuntaka did not consider alamkara (ornament) an essential part of poetry; the true essence lies in the natural beauty created by the union of word and meaning through Vakrokti.
Kuntaka further discussed marga (style) and guna (qualities of poetry). He described three styles: Sukumara Marga (soft and delicate style), Vichitra Marga (ornate and complex style), and Ubhayatmaka Marga (a blend of the two). He also listed important poetic qualities such as Madhurya (sweetness), Prasada (clarity), Lavanya (grace), and Abhijatya (dignity), later adding Auchitya (propriety) and Saubhagya (excellence). These styles and qualities were, for Kuntaka, the foundation of poetic beauty.
In conclusion, Kuntaka’s Vakrokti Theory is a landmark in Indian literary criticism. Unlike earlier critics who treated Vakrokti as a mere figure of speech, he made it the very life of poetry. Poetry, according to him, is distinguished from ordinary language by its unique expression, created through the intelligence and craftsmanship of the poet. His classification of Vakrokti into six types provided a method of literary criticism, while his ideas of Sahitya, style, and poetic qualities expanded the scope of poetics. By balancing the poet’s creative role with the reader’s aesthetic response, Kuntaka showed remarkable insight into both language and literature. His contribution ensures him a lasting place among the greatest theorists in Indian poetics.
Comments
Post a Comment